Fri. Jul. 16, 2004. | Updated at 08:44 AM
Careers Classifieds New In Homes Photos Shopping Travel Wheels
More search options
Ticker Name
 
  
  Notice to our readers
 
 
Search the Web
Thestar.com Google Search
Previous Story
Print Story
E-mail Story
May 16, 2004. 01:00 AM
 
Jim Coyle  
Rosie Dimanno  
Joe Fiorito  
Christopher Hume  
Royson James  
It's a waterlogged Arctic puzzle
Arctic researchers studying impact of climate change

Chemical assault plays havoc with polar ecosystems

PETER CALAMAI
SCIENCE WRITER

ABOARD CCGS AMUNDSEN—After five weeks aboard an icebreaker in the Arctic Ocean, researcher Gary Stern headed home last week, with 200 kilograms of seawater in seven cooler chests following as extra baggage.

Painstaking analysis of the water at Winnipeg laboratories should help start deciphering a big environmental puzzle: How much will climate change worsen the chemical assault on the Arctic?

And those coolers packed with half-litre bottles represent just a small portion of the extensive samples that Stern, lab technician Joanne Delaronde and other colleagues are gathering during 11 months aboard the Amundsen, Canada's first research icebreaker.

There are samples of Arctic cod, plankton and other marine creatures, filters from high-capacity air samplers and much, much more water — some collected from under sea ice; some representing thin layers of snow; some that used to be ice; and microscopic residues from tens of thousands of litres sucked through submerged pumps.

Measuring concentrations as low as parts per trillion for as many as 200 chemicals in these samples will cost roughly $400,000 and take more than a year, says Stern, an expert in Arctic contamination with the federal fisheries department and an environment professor at the University of Manitoba.

There are also isotopic signatures to be checked that reveal the source of the water and where the various marine creatures acquire the carbon they convert into carbohydrates.

But don't expect all these measurements to produce easy answers.

"We don't really understand what is happening with contamination processes here now, much less what may happen with climate change," says Stern.

The challenge for researchers engaged in the multi-year, $66 million research mission is not only the complexity of the physical, chemical and biological processes in northern ecosystems but also the benign neglect of Arctic science by successive federal governments over the past three decades.

Even in a southern and relatively populated region of the Arctic, like Hudson's Bay, scientists can only guess at the variety of fish and their numbers — essential basic information for projections of climate-change impact.

What's not in question is the tainting of the once-pristine Arctic environment by chemicals wafted here from industry, agriculture and human endeavours elsewhere, as far away as China and India.

Traces of a ubiquitous flame retardant have been found in the Arctic's most remote corners.

In the western Arctic, mercury has reached parts per million in beluga whales.

In Norway's Spitzbergen, gender-bending PCBs are blamed for polar bears that are hermaphroditic, with both male and female sexual trappings in the same animal.

It's not all gloom.

Levels of pesticides and other organochlorine compounds are now dropping in marine mammals in the eastern Arctic and the PCB contamination of beluga in the St. Lawrence River can still be 100 times higher than that of their Arctic-dwelling counterparts.

But along the St. Lawrence, people merely watch the whales. Here, the Inuit eat them as part of a diet that includes seal meat, which also carries detectable levels of contaminants linked to health problems in higher doses.

Despite these chemicals, federal health officials say the traditional diet is still healthier for the Inuit than the alternative of processed southern foods. But climate change could alter that equation.

Consider mercury, a highly toxic chemical that seeps into the atmosphere in small doses from natural sources and is pumped out in much larger amounts by smelters and coal-fired powered plants.

Studies by federal meteorological scientists in the 1990s discovered what causes mercury transported from those sources in the south to be drawn down from the Arctic skies during spring precipitation.

On a surface of powdery snow, ultraviolet light from the early sun, atmospheric ozone and bromine generated naturally by algae and sea spray combine in what is known as a mercury-depletion event.

Now, add climate change to that recipe.

Says Stern: "If warmer winters mean less multi-year ice and more first-year ice, that should mean more light transmission through the ice and a higher production of under-ice algae.

"That could then bring more bromine."

And therefore a heavier mercury transfer into the water where — under certain conditions — it changes into the highly toxic and reactive form called methylmercury, which was responsible for poisoning both fish and humans in Grassy Narrows, Ont.

There are still more twists and turns in the saga of mercury and Arctic climate change.

Stern and others involved with an ArcticNet research consortium are investigating the prospect of a triple whammy from rising average temperatures and reduced precipitation that computer climate models project will be most severe in the North:

The region of year-round permafrost is already shrinking.

Melting permafrost raises the prospect that atmospheric mercury trapped there could be released.

The Mackenzie River watershed has warmed at the rate of one degree Celsius a decade since the 1970s. Warmer water probably will encourage growth of the sulphur-reducing bacteria that are pivotal in producing the dangerous methylmercury.

Over the last 10 years, Canada has experienced forest fires of unprecedented intensity and reach, resulting in the atmospheric release of mercury.

Lower rainfall boosts the risk of forest fires, again increasing the amount of mercury that could rain down on the Arctic.

Mercury contamination in western Arctic beluga whales today is four times the level of two decades ago; whale-teeth studies found only a ninefold increase over the past six centuries.

The whales might also be feeding in a part of the Arctic Ocean where cod have higher mercury levels. Lisa Loseto, a University of Manitoba zoology Ph.D. student working with Stern, will investigate this possibility by fitting radio collars to 10 beluga whales this summer.

"We want to find out if the whales are following the receding sea ice," says Stern. "And is that because the cod are also following the ice?"

Other researchers in the consortium are undertaking detailed studies of the physical properties of the sea ice, which in turn will help project how climate change might affect ice cover over the entire Arctic.

And that ties back into the whole contaminants issue, not only mercury but also the organochlorines for which the Winnipeg labs will be looking —110 varieties of PCBs, six of DDT and other insecticides like dieldrin, endosulfan and toxaphene, which can occur in more than a dozen guises.

Add to all that the many unresolved questions about how contaminants interact with plant and animal life in the water column and you have a hint of the complexity of addressing the climate-change question in the Arctic.

"Before this trip, I never really realized how important zooplankton sh-- can be," sighs Stern, contemplating the prospect of the tonnes of Arctic seawater that eventually will turn up in Winnipeg.

Additional articles by Peter Calamai


› Pay less than $3 per week for 7 day home delivery.

Previous Story
Print Story
E-mail Story
> ADVERTISEMENT <



Legal Notice: Copyright Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. All rights reserved. Distribution, transmission or republication of any material from http://www.thestar.com/ is strictly prohibited without the prior written permission of Toronto Star Newspapers Limited. For information please contact us using our webmaster form. www.thestar.com online since 1996.